Milk Float is a free educational/social meetup event we’ve organised over at Float. It’s a good opportunity to meet like-minded creative people and hear about engaging subjects. If you are free this Thurs, 22 July, sign up on meetup and come along.

The curiousness of children is infinite. My 18 month baby is into everything, looking, pointing, grabbing, pulling. As any parent will tell you, it is pretty relentless as the world is explored anew. With each discovery comes the instinctual need to communicate with us what they are thinking and feeling. It is phenomenal how much is actually being taken in but of course without language, deciphering the baa-baa-beedahh-dees feels like a task for Bletchley Park.

What has been incredibly enlightening however was how gesturing through sign language can help to bridge that gap. After several months of “Sign and Sign”, which is a baby group to teach basic sign language, I was able to communicate about specific things; abstract and literal. For example, if she sees a star then fanning the fingers out from a fist tells us or if she is hungry or has a pain then a simple gesture lets us know. The recognition of understanding and being able to communicate is self evident, it is what we all continue to try to achieve even after the nappies are off.

The parallels between this and gestural interaction are clear. If you can communicate with your audience using simple gestures they are likely to become engaged more easily as the threshold to participation is lowered. I no longer need to coordinate by hand with the mouse to cause a cursor to move to a specific point to click…baa-baa-beedahh… I just press, or circle or swipe.  It is inherent, immediate, intuitive and why these types of interfaces are becoming woven more tightly into our social fabric.

Here’s some of the profiles I stumbled upon. The way this space is used to herald a users presence makes a pretty good exercise in communication and copywriting. How do you describe yourself in fewer than 160 chars? What are you trying to say and who are you saying it to?

Online social networks are a part of our lives in a big way. They have been for years however the pervasiveness and rate of adoption of these networks has reached a level where almost everyone and their dog has a Facebook or other online social profile. Facebook alone has an active membership now larger than the worlds 4th most populous country. I feel like I should say that again. Staggering. What’s more is that it’s not inconceivable that this figure will rise to a 1, particularly if it is able to spread into China.

What all of these sites have in common is a profile. A projection of yourself to the rest of the network, written and edited exclusively by you, the user. So now we’ve all become self publicists, blogging our life under the umbrella of social networking; marketing ourselves to faithfully represent who we are and commonly what we do. It also suggests as Fred Vogelstein, observed in an excellent Wired article that the famous adage “on the internet no one knows you’re a dog” is resonating less strongly.

Role play

The plethora of services I use (or have accounts with) means I also have many associated profiles. Maintaining these can be a pain although in some cases a funny excursion into the past where monikers of our previous online selfs echo in the past having not kept pace with our evolution (RIP Dil8ted, RIP BillBeef, RIP TonyTonieTone, RIP Marquess541…).

This way of speaking about the self may sound a little strange, as they are I, not entities in and of themselves surely? The point being that we can name ourself and assume a character and as that character participate in the online space. As Sherry Turkle pointed out way back in ‘95 “Windows have become a powerful metaphor for thinking about the self as a multiple, distributed system…The self is no longer simply playing different roles in different settings at different times. The life practice of windows is that of a decentered self that exists in many worlds, that plays many roles at the same time.” Sherry Turkle has researched and written about identity and our online self in great depth and is recommended reading.

With this ability to assume names and personas comes the implicit recognition that we are role playing. Taken to hideous extremes people commit cyber-crimes but more commonly it is the nuances in our interests that separate and motivate us to form groups, in the same way Paul David Hewson goes by the name of Bono. We like to role play whether we think we are doing it or not, if we’re online we have a username, it is expressive and allows us to communicate and connect with people in ways we might not otherwise.

Facebook makes it hyper real(!)

That is of course until we revealed our RL self and got proof about the dog. “Internet users behaved differently on Facebook than anywhere else online: They used their real names, connected with their real friends, linked to their real email addresses, and shared their real thoughts, tastes, and news.” Fred Vogelstein, Wired

This creates an environment of accountability. One expects more of a user, potentially imbuing them with greater trust, e.g. Amazon “real name” reviews, if they can be placed in the real world than an abstract transient moniker and arguably most significantly this changes our expectation when we leave the domain. Facebook Connect makes it easy for their population’s “Real Identity” to persist elsewhere as their blog announcement outlines, “Facebook users represent themselves with their real names and real identities. With Facebook Connect, users can bring their real identity information with them wherever they go on the Web, including: basic profile information, profile picture, name, friends, photos, events, groups, and more.”

So now it is reasonable to expect to find John Smith and Jane Doe all over the web instead of Sureshot and Rach2k. What would the complexion of this evolved real-virtual-web be like and how will we choose to interact as a result? what implications for designing social proof into applications does this present? What risks to identity theft arise? What happens when your namesakes comment, post, flame..?

I recently watched someone sitting on the plinth, looking bored and as I did it seemed to me that I was just expecting too much. By putting a person on the plinth, the expectations the viewer brings to the experience is altered so no longer is it enough to simply look at the figure knowing they are capable of more than statuesque silence.

Participatory interaction

Another plinth that changes the role of the viewer into that of a participant is Greyworld’s “Monument” behind the Tate Modern. In this case the viewer is mimicked by the figure, which tracks their movement using cameras and strikes a pose in response. It is not obvious that this statue is anything out of the ordinary. There are no signs or reasons to interact, so I assume that was a deliberate design choice to create surprise although it was either broken or taking a break when I tried it out and nothing could rouse the statue. The result was a interesting piece of interactive design in concept alone.

Interaction values

These two plinths tried to do something different and succeeded but also lost a lot of people along the way. It’s an interesting reminder that when the context is changed one also needs to consider what the viewer user participant brings with them in terms of expectation as this will alter their resulting experience.

…Bit late but here’s some of the things that tingled my tinkle this (last) month (August).

The Human Printer - A labour of love. These art students are hand printing by the pixel. OCD but i love it.

Interview with Matt Furie - Interview with spaceman illustrator Matt Furie. #feelsgoodman

The pomodoro technique - Getting productive in an Agile fashion using a tomato timer. wat. yeah.

Sculpting in sound - Beautiful artistic work by Andy Huntington, who creates scultpures of sound….best check the link to see what i mean.

But does it float - Curated, endlessly inspiring blog of an interesting collection of random things

enjoyings :]

The video below illustrates this line of thinking perfectly. Tinker Hatfield is a talented guy - Nike’s Vice President of Innovation Design - who trained as an Architect and transitioned to Product Design whilst working at Nike. He is responsible for the classic Air Max and drew significant inspiration from the Pompidou Centre. “If I had not seen the building I might not have suggested we expose the air bag and make it visual and let people see inside the shoe.”

Having the idea however is only one part of innovating… as he goes on to say, it also takes courage to see it through “When you do something different you have to have a pretty thick skin, people are going to take shots at you. They are going to criticise what they don’t understand.”

It’s an inspiring short, have a watch, thicken up your skin and go see a new bit of the world.

^ “Respect the Architects” by Thibaut de Longeville.

Lols

Biggest lol came from “Business guys on business trips.” A satirical illustration and commentary on the design industry

The annotated weekender’s characters add a bit of spicy augmentation to the editorial.

Tech

Video for everybody with the HTML5 spec of video embedding… until is got squashed.

A decent summary of core user experience links, book recommendations and other signposts for further investigation from Whitney Hess.

Brian Christiansen’s pattern collection captures findings of consistent, unique or interesting interfaces and design flows from across the web.

Site check

Graze’s food delivery service uses carefully considered interaction that extensively uses AJAX to provide a smooth experience, focusing the user on their activity.

The Magnetic North agency uses gestural techniques to create a playful way of exploring their offering.

Music

Awesome tapes from Africa dusty tapes of blissful music from Africa. Reminds me how much incredible music is being made beyond the realms of our digital world.

Gadget

Pacemaker gadget want. Playful interaction on a portable mixing device.

Received my Twitter-by-jpg. Very exciting. Futile in many ways but hugely appealing and valuable in many more. The initial idea was that you could request a tweet on paper, which you’d receive by post…. living outside the US I could only request the .jpg option.

The subversive concept intriguing of it - without wanting to disappear into a stenching art critique hole - but also the craft. It reminds me of Dada and Fluxus artist’s who used the postal system to create and collaborate on art work as well as the participatory art of Sophie Calle who will often use the correspondence between herself and the subject as part of the final work.

Remote villagers

Doing a quick search around for other services and sites that do this kind of thing I stumbled across a few companies that will turn your emails into atoms, integrating with Salesforce.com, offering API’s the whole shebang but it was the justification suggested at Digital Inspiration that appealed the most:

“1. Some of your relatives live in remote villages where they don’t have computers let alone access to Internet.

2. Your grandparents know computers but they’ll probably feel more happy if you could send them emails and photographs in paper form that they can read in the lawn outside.”

All very worthy and especially amusing when it comes to thinking about Twitter.

…My last tweet was “Vision going.” Some more interesting reading about postal art. If you would like to send me a Tweet: 6 Salem Road, Bayswater, London W2 4BU

Curious to see how the live pigeons would react to it I decided to reunite pigeon with its friends at Hyde Park. Here’s what happened.

^ Pigeons first introduction to his friends at the park

^ An edited version at high speed. Pigeon gets mauled by a dog and scares a child…

So it seemed to me that at the start the other pigeons were too busy foraging and the swarm of birds arriving too frenetic for any of them to be particularly bothered by “Pige-God” however after this initial furore they approached cautiously and appear to sense that there was something not quite right about this one. In the first video you can see the other pigeons crane their necks and back up a little (1:37) after initially rushing for the bread. Ultimately though they didn’t really care and just wanted food.

If any ethologists happen across this post I’d be interested in a more scientific explanation. Also if there is anybody with mad animatronic skills that can help me 2.0 Pige-God do get in touch.